Case 3304579/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Tribunal upholds unlawful-deduction-from-wages and holiday-pay claims against Bangers and Mash Ltd
It found that Bangers and Mash Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £766.15. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £422.54.
- Case reference
- 3304579/2020
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Nichols
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the case under Rule 21 and made two awards in the claimant's favour. It found that Bangers and Mash Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr B Nichols's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £766.15.
It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £422.54. The judgment does not set out any further reasoning, legal tests, or separate remedy calculation beyond those two sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £766.15. | Upheld | — | £766 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £422.54. | Upheld | — | £423 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,189
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.