Case 3304619/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Neel Rana v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3304619/2018
- Decision date
- 9 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Neel Rana
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing at Reading on 9 January 2019, the tribunal decided that it had jurisdiction to consider the claimant's complaints.
The written record does not set out the nature of the complaints, any legal test applied, or any remedy. It notes that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the specified time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written preliminary hearing judgment records only that the tribunal had jurisdiction to consider the claimant's complaints. It does not identify the underlying complaints or determine their merits. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.