Case 3304626/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Eiler v And Maersk Line UK Limited Telephone Private Preliminary Hearing (Case Management) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3304626/2020
- Decision date
- 31 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vowles JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Eiler
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt this private preliminary hearing on 11 March 2021, Employment Judge Vowles considered whether Mr A Eiler could pursue a claim of unfair dismissal against Maersk Line UK Limited. The judgment records that the hearing was a case management hearing and that the claimant was represented by Mr M McKeating, solicitor.
The Tribunal found that the claimant did not have the necessary two years' length of employment to bring an unfair dismissal claim. On that basis, it held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the claim and dismissed the unfair dismissal claim. No other substantive claims or remedies were determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal held that the claimant did not have the necessary two years' continuous employment to bring an unfair dismissal claim, so it had no jurisdiction to consider it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.