Case 3304639/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Sterling (in person) For the v Respondent — 2024
- Case reference
- 3304639/2020
- Decision date
- 27 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen
- Panel members
- Mr D Bean, Mrs L Thompson
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Sterling (in person) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing at Watford Tribunal on 23-27 September 2024 before Employment Judge Cowen sitting with Mr D Bean and Mrs L Thompson, Mr M Sterling appeared in person and Mitie Limited was represented by Ms S King. The written record states that the claimant brought claims for unlawful deduction of wages and direct discrimination.
The Tribunal dismissed both claims. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested, so no further factual findings or remedy are recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The written judgment uses the phrase 'direct discrimination' and does not specify the protected characteristic; the case listing identifies the case as race discrimination. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.