Case 3304665/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person. For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3304665/2018
- Decision date
- 17 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cassel Members
- Venue
- Cambridge
- Panel members
- Mrs A Carvell, Mrs CA Smith
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person. For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Cambridge on 24, 25, 26, 27 and 28 February 2020 and 2 and 3 March 2020, Employment Judge Cassel, sitting with members Mrs A Carvell and Mrs CA Smith, heard Mr M Ransom's claims against East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust. Mr Ransom appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms J Smeaton of counsel.
The tribunal dismissed the claim of constructive unfair dismissal. It also dismissed the claim of detriment by reason of public interest disclosure. The judgment records no remedy award in relation to either claim.
The disability discrimination claim was withdrawn and the judgment records it as dismissed on withdrawal. The written record also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment refers to this as a claim of constructive unfair dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment refers to this as a claim of detriment by reason of public interest disclosure. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the disability discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.