Case 3304668/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Charlton v Strata Panels — 2018
- Case reference
- 3304668/2018
- Decision date
- 16 December 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Palmer Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Charlton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that, following its letters of 19 November 2018 and 16 December 2018, there had been no response from the Claimant. On that basis, it held that the Claimant’s claims were not being actively pursued.
The judgment states that the claims were struck out under Rule 37(1)(d). No findings were made on the underlying merits of the breach of contract or unlawful deduction from wages allegations.
No remedy was awarded because the case was struck out before any substantive determination. The judgment is a short procedural disposal only.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Struck out because there was no response from the Claimant to the Tribunal’s letters dated 19 November 2018 and 16 December 2018, so the claim was not actively pursued under Rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Struck out because there was no response from the Claimant to the Tribunal’s letters dated 19 November 2018 and 16 December 2018, so the claim was not actively pursued under Rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.