Case 3304669/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Farmer v Fresh Cut Video Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3304669/2024
- Decision date
- 4 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCooey REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Reading in public in person
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Farmer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the complaint of automatically unfair dismissal was well-founded and succeeded. It also recorded that the complaint of pregnancy discrimination was well-founded and succeeded.
The complaints of direct sex discrimination, victimisation, and wrongful dismissal were dismissed upon withdrawal. The complaint of failure to deal with a flexible working request was recorded as not well-founded and failed.
The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No remedy figures or detailed reasons are included in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment states that the complaint of automatically unfair dismissal is well-founded and succeeds; no remedy figure is provided. | Upheld | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The written judgment states that the complaint of pregnancy discrimination is well-founded and succeeds; no remedy figure is provided. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Sex discrimination | The written judgment states that the complaint of direct sex discrimination is dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Victimisation | The written judgment states that the complaint of victimisation is dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The written judgment states that the complaint of wrongful dismissal is dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Flexible working | The written judgment states that the complaint of failure to deal with a flexible working request is not well-founded and fails. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.