Case 3304688/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Daniel Jones v Celsus Group Limited (in administration) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3304688/2024
- Decision date
- 30 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Milner-Moore Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Daniel Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Daniel Jones, brought a breach of contract complaint against Celsus Group Limited (in administration) concerning unpaid commission. The matter was heard by video at Reading on 30 September 2025 before Employment Judge Milner-Moore. The claimant appeared in person; the respondent did not attend.
The tribunal found the complaint of breach of contract in relation to unpaid commission to be well-founded. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £5,782.33 in damages, comprising £3,850.47 for unpaid commission in respect of work performed in January 2024 and £1,931.86 for work performed in February 2024.
The tribunal recorded that the award was calculated using gross pay and that the claimant is responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on the sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Unpaid commission for work performed in January 2024 (£3,850.47) and February 2024 (£1,931.86). Figure calculated using gross pay; claimant responsible for tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £5,782 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,782
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.