Case 3304706/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Ansah v Scope — 2025
- Case reference
- 3304706/2024
- Decision date
- 11 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dick Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Ansah
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms C Ansah, brought complaints of unfair dismissal, unauthorised deductions from wages, and race discrimination against Scope. The tribunal heard the case at Watford on 9 May 2025 before Employment Judge Dick. The judgment records that the decision was given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The tribunal did not determine the merits of the dismissal or pay complaints. It found that the unfair dismissal complaint and the unauthorised deductions from wages complaint were not presented within the applicable time limit, and that it was reasonably practicable to do so. Those complaints were therefore dismissed.
The race discrimination complaint was also found to have been presented out of time. The tribunal held that it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit, and that complaint was dismissed as well. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit; the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to do so. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed because the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was not presented within the applicable time limit; the tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to do so. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed because the complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit and the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- reasonably practicable to do so
- just and equitable to extend the time limit
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.