Case 3304730/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Sauberlich v Oxford Precision Components UK Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3304730/2018
- Decision date
- 11 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge KJ Palmer
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Sauberlich
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAll four claimants, Mr A Barry, Mr F Fowler, Mr M Kennett and Mr P Sauberlich, were employed by Oxford Precision Components UK Ltd. They arrived at the respondent's premises on 16 December 2017 and found the exterior locks had been changed by the landlord, after which they could not access the site to work. The tribunal accepted that management later said the lease issue would be resolved and wages would continue, but no further payments were made. Each claimant wrote to the respondent and, after receiving no response, treated himself as dismissed on 11 January 2018 in Mr Barry's case and 19 January 2018 in the other three cases.
The respondent filed no response and did not attend, so the case proceeded under Rule 21 before Employment Judge KJ Palmer sitting alone. The tribunal accepted the claimants' evidence and schedules of loss, and found effective dates of termination of 11 January 2018 for Mr Barry and 19 January 2018 for Mr Fowler, Mr Kennett and Mr Sauberlich. It also found that all four had mitigated their loss by finding other work relatively quickly.
For each claimant the tribunal upheld claims for statutory redundancy payment, unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, holiday pay and unlawful deduction of wages. It corrected the loss of statutory rights figure, rejecting the schedules' two-weeks' gross pay approach and awarding £500 in each case. The individual awards were £5,175.44 for Mr Barry, £27,401.69 for Mr Fowler, £24,755.09 for Mr Kennett and £22,048.03 for Mr Sauberlich, making a total of £79,380.25.
Claims and outcomes
20 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Mr A Barry. Statutory redundancy payment/basic award of £978.00; the tribunal said this was to be deducted from the unfair dismissal award. | Upheld | — | £978 |
| Unfair dismissal | Mr A Barry. Effective date of termination 11 January 2018. Compensatory award of £889.04, including £500 for loss of statutory rights; the basic award/statutory redundancy payment was recorded separately. | Upheld | — | £889 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Mr A Barry. 2 weeks' net pay awarded as notice pay. | Upheld | — | £941 |
| Holiday pay | Mr A Barry. Holiday pay under the Working Time Directive. | Upheld | — | £92 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Mr A Barry. Unlawful deduction of wages for the period 17 December 2017 to 11 January 2018. | Upheld | — | £2,276 |
| Redundancy | Mr F Fowler. Statutory redundancy payment/basic award of £13,936.50; the tribunal said this was to be deducted from the unfair dismissal award. | Upheld | — | £13,937 |
| Unfair dismissal | Mr F Fowler. Effective date of termination 19 January 2018. Compensatory award of £722.86, including £500 for loss of statutory rights; the basic award/statutory redundancy payment was recorded separately. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £79,380
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £25,428
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £20,418
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.