Case 3304768/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. S Sivapantham v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3304768/2018
- Decision date
- 8 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sage Members
- Venue
- London South Croydon
- Panel members
- Ms L. Grayson, Ms N O'Hare
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. S Sivapantham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr S Sivapantham brought claims against Tesco Stores Limited. The matter was heard at London South Croydon on 8 August 2019 before Employment Judge Sage with members Ms L. Grayson and Ms N O'Hare.
The tribunal's judgment states only that the Claimant's claims are dismissed on terms agreed between the parties. No reasons, factual findings, legal analysis, or remedy figures are provided in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the Claimant's claims are dismissed on terms agreed between the parties. It gives no separate reasons or claim-specific disposal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the Claimant's claims are dismissed on terms agreed between the parties. Race discrimination is identified from the supplied listing category, but the judgment text itself does not set out the discrimination allegation or reasons. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.