Case 3304810/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Evans v CamelotPM Ltd in compulsory liquidation — 2021
- Case reference
- 3304810/2020
- Decision date
- 7 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Evans
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Miss M Evans's claim against CamelotPM Ltd, which was in compulsory liquidation. It recorded that the permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The Tribunal also noted that on 15 March 2021 it had given the claimant 14 days to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason, and the claim was therefore struck out by Regional Employment Judge Foxwell on 6 May 2021, with judgment sent to the parties on 7 May 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The respondent was in compulsory liquidation and the permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued as required by the Insolvency Act 1986. The Tribunal also recorded that the claimant had been given an opportunity on 15 March 2021 to provide written reasons within 14 days why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued, but no acceptable reason was given. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.