Case 3304866/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jeremy Copeman v Buck Inn Flixton Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3304866/2025
- Decision date
- 12 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Skehan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jeremy Copeman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Skehan ordered Buck Inn Flixton Limited to pay Mr Jeremy Copeman £4,032 within 14 days. The claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,890, calculated using his age, gross weekly pay of £630 and two full years of service.
The unauthorised deduction from wages/breach of contract claim was well-founded, resulting in £252 for salary unpaid on 26 and 27 March 2025, calculated at nine hours per day and £14 per hour. The claimant was also awarded £1,260 for his two-week notice period and £630 for one week of accrued but untaken holiday. The judgment recorded that the redundancy payment was not subject to tax and that the remaining awards used gross figures, with the claimant responsible for any tax payable.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,890 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as an unauthorised deduction from wages/breach of contract claim concerning unpaid salary. | Upheld | — | £252 |
| Breach of contract | Award for the claimant's two-week notice period. | Upheld | — | £1,260 |
| Holiday pay | Award for one week of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £630 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,032
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.