Case 3304869/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Willsea v CamelotPM Ltd in compulsory liquidation — 2021
- Case reference
- 3304869/2020
- Decision date
- 7 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Willsea
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr P Willsea's claim against CamelotPM Ltd in compulsory liquidation. It held that the respondent company was in compulsory liquidation and that the permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal also recorded that on 15 March 2021 it had given the claimant 14 days to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason.
For those reasons, the tribunal struck out the claim. No substantive liability findings or monetary award were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. The claim was struck out because the respondent was in compulsory liquidation and court permission under the Insolvency Act 1986 had not been obtained, and because the claimant did not give an acceptable reason after the 15 March 2021 direction. The gov.uk listing categories include Protective Award and Redundancy, but those are not specified in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.