Case 3304881/2023 · Employment Tribunal

Mr S Moore v Openreach Ltd — 2024

Case reference: 3304881/2023
Decision date: 15 March 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Anstis

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr S Moore

Respondent

Openreach Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that any claim other than the claims expressly listed in the judgment was struck out. The judgment does not identify the other claims or give written reasons for the strike-out.

The claims permitted to continue were constructive unfair dismissal, based on an alleged breach of the duty of trust and confidence arising from the respondent's alleged failure in November or December 2022 to address complaints about poor provision of location information and failure to provide a printer; disability discrimination by alleged failure to make reasonable adjustments concerning provision of poor location information; notice pay; and holiday pay.

The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested. No remedy was awarded in this written judgment.

Claims and outcomes

5 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Constructive dismissal	The constructive unfair dismissal claim was permitted to continue; the judgment does not determine its merits.	Other	—	—
Disability discrimination	The failure to make reasonable adjustments claim was permitted to continue; the judgment does not determine its merits.	Other	Disability	—
Wrongful dismissal	The notice pay claim was permitted to continue; the judgment does not determine its merits.	Other	—	—
Holiday pay	The holiday pay claim was permitted to continue; the judgment does not determine its merits.	Other	—	—
Other	Any claim other than the listed continuing claims was struck out, but the judgment does not identify the struck-out claims.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.