Case 3304889/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Sells v Darren Lee Hancock — 2021
- Case reference
- 3304889/2020
- Decision date
- 11 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Sells
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 25 September 2021, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, explaining why the claim should not be struck out for failure to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 20 May 2021. The judgment records that the claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Anstis struck out the claim. The judgment does not contain any determination on the merits of the underlying complaint, and no compensation or other remedy was awarded.
The hearing listed for 22 October 2021 was vacated and did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment text does not specify the pleaded claim type; classified from the gov.uk listing for this case. The judgment records that 'the claim' was struck out for non-compliance with an earlier Tribunal order. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment text does not specify the pleaded claim type; classified from the gov.uk listing for this case. The judgment records that 'the claim' was struck out for non-compliance with an earlier Tribunal order. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.