Case 3304901/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Tribunal upholds unlawful-deduction-from-wages and breach-of-contract claims against Delmore Ltd
It found that Delmore Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £131.00. The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £393.00.
- Case reference
- 3304901/2020
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Gayler
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the claim on the papers under Rule 21. It found that Delmore Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss K Gayler's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £131.00.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £393.00. No discrimination, unfair dismissal, or other statutory claims are recorded in the judgment text, and no separate remedy breakdown beyond the two sums ordered is provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £131.00. | Upheld | — | £131 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £393.00. | Upheld | — | £393 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £524
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.