Case 3304916/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Pan v Wizard Consultancy Services Limited ('in voluntary liquidation') and 4 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 3304916/2020
- Decision date
- 3 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis
Parties
6 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim in its entirety. It recorded that all claims against respondent 1, Wizard Consultancy Services Limited, were struck out because the company had been dissolved. It also struck out all claims against respondents 3 and 5 because the claimant had not paid the required deposits.
The judgment further states that all discrimination claims contrary to the Equality Act 2010 were struck out because the claimant had not paid a deposit. The listed hearing fixed for 25 November to 3 December 2024 was cancelled and would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that proceedings were struck out in their entirety. It specifically says all claims against respondent 1 were struck out because it had been dissolved, and all claims against respondents 3 and 5 were struck out because the claimant had not paid the deposits. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment says all claims of discrimination contrary to the Equality Act 2010 were struck out because the claimant had not paid a deposit. The extracted PDF does not specify the protected characteristic, but the case listing identifies race discrimination. | Struck out | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.