Case 3304919/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Harry Portch, Director of the respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3304919/2020
- Decision date
- 10 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Forde Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss E Wilsden's claims against HM Staffing Limited were heard at Watford on 14 January 2022 before Employment Judge Forde. The tribunal did not uphold the claimant's notice pay claim or her holiday pay claim.
The tribunal did uphold the claimant's unlawful deduction from wages complaint. It found that the respondent had not paid the claimant for the period from 1 February 2020 to 10 February 2020 inclusive. The written judgment records an award of five days' statutory sick pay totalling £94.25, together with one day's pay for 10 February 2020 at a gross rate of £101.38.
The total sum ordered to be paid was therefore £195.63. No separate award for notice pay or holiday pay was made because those claims were not upheld.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay was not upheld. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages for the period 1 February 2020 to 10 February 2020 inclusive. The order covered five days' statutory sick pay (£94.25) and one day's pay for 10 February 2020 at £101.38 gross. | Upheld | — | £196 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for holiday pay was not upheld. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £196
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.