Case 3304931/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S McKinven v Gavin Rodrigues — 2023
- Case reference
- 3304931/2023
- Decision date
- 21 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S McKinven
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 7 November 2023 at Reading by CVP, before Employment Judge Anstis, Mr S McKinven appeared in person and Gavin Rodrigues appeared in person. The tribunal held that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages and had breached the contract of employment by failing to pay wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £988.05 net to the claimant in compensation. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note on the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from wages in relation to unpaid wages. The judgment does not split the compensation between this finding and the breach of contract finding. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal also found that the respondent had breached the claimant's contract of employment by failing to pay wages. The judgment records one net compensation figure rather than separate amounts for each finding. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £988
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.