Case 3304934/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Arif and others v St Marys & St Giles Church — 2021
- Case reference
- 3304934/2020
- Decision date
- 30 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge ORD Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Arif and others
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response having been received to the claimants' claims, the tribunal entered a Rule 21 judgment. It held that each claimant had been the victim of unlawful discrimination on the grounds of sex as alleged in the claim form submitted on 26 May 2020.
The tribunal also held that each claimant had suffered unlawful deductions from wages because they had not been paid for accrued but untaken holiday. Remedy was not determined in this judgment: a hearing to determine remedy was listed for Cambridge Employment Tribunal on 30 April 2021, and the claimants were directed to file schedules of loss, supporting documents, statements of facts and any witness statements within 42 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Rule 21 default judgment. Remedy was listed for a later hearing on 30 April 2021. | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimants had not been paid for accrued but untaken holiday. Remedy was listed for a later hearing on 30 April 2021. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.