Case 3304940/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs FPV Coutinho e Pereira v Face 2 Face Outsource Solutions Ltd – in liquidation — 2024
- Case reference
- 3304940/2022
- Decision date
- 7 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst Representation
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs FPV Coutinho e Pereira
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Reading hearing on 15 January 2024, before Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst, the claimant, Mrs FPV Coutinho e Pereira, appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The judgment records that the claimant succeeded on three claims: unauthorised deduction of wages, notice pay, and holiday pay.
The tribunal awarded £1,136.04 for unauthorised deduction of wages, £307.50 as damages for notice pay, and £517.90 for holiday pay. The judgment states that the figures for the wages and holiday pay awards were gross of tax, and that tax would need to be deducted at source before payment was made.
The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £1,961.44. The written record also notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award stated to be gross of tax; tax to be deducted at source before payment. | Upheld | — | £1,136 |
| Breach of contract | Award described as damages for notice pay. | Upheld | — | £308 |
| Holiday pay | Award stated to be gross of tax; tax to be deducted at source before payment. | Upheld | — | £518 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,961
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.