Case 3305008/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Hollingworth v Cambridge Housing Society Ltd t/a Cambridge Housing Society Group RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2025
- Case reference
- 3305008/2022
- Decision date
- 28 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Hollingworth
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a public preliminary hearing in Cambridge on 13 October 2025, Employment Judge Tynan sitting alone struck out Ms Hollingworth's claim. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The written record states that the tribunal made the order under Rules 38(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record strikes out the claim as a whole and does not set out a separate outcome for each head of claim; this entry reflects the case category listed on the tribunal record. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The written record strikes out the claim as a whole and does not set out a separate outcome for each head of claim; this entry reflects the case category listed on the tribunal record. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rules 38(1)(c) and (d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.