Case 3305033/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Crew (counsel) For the v Respondent — 2023
- Case reference
- 3305033/2022
- Decision date
- 12 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge King Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms Crew (counsel) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Watford Employment Tribunal hearing on 1 February 2023, before Employment Judge King, the tribunal ordered that the claim be struck out as an abuse of process. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless a request had been made at the hearing or within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
The extracted judgment does not set out the substantive factual allegations or any detailed reasoning beyond the strike-out outcome. It therefore records only the procedural result and the basis stated in the order, namely abuse of process. No compensation or other remedy was awarded in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The extracted judgment records only that the claim was struck out as an abuse of process. The underlying cause of action is not stated in the extracted text; classification as disability discrimination follows the case listing/context provided. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.