Case 3305040/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Barby Ms S Gildersleve Mrs E Hoxha Mrs J Hurley Miss K Millward Mrs M Ramon-Lopez Mrs B Reeves Mrs L Taylor Mrs F Walker Miss L Welch Miss E Wingrove v Grand Union Partnership Multi Academy Trust – Jubilee Wood School — 2020
- Case reference
- 3305040/2020
- Decision date
- 6 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Barby Ms S Gildersleve Mrs E Hoxha Mrs J Hurley Miss K Millward Mrs M Ramon-Lopez Mrs B Reeves Mrs L Taylor Mrs F Walker Miss L Welch Miss E Wingrove
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in case number 3305040/2020 to 3305050/2020. Employment Judge Ord recorded that the claim succeeds, but the extracted judgment text does not set out the underlying allegations or the legal basis of the claim in detail.
The tribunal also recorded that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled will be determined at a Remedy Hearing. No monetary award is given in this judgment, and no split between different heads of loss is recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the legal basis of the claim in the extracted text; it states only that the claim succeeds and that remedy will be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.