Case 3305084/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Young v Woodland Group Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3305084/2022
- Decision date
- 12 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Mrs S Hockey, Ms B Osborne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Young
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr T Young, brought a complaint against Woodland Group Limited at Reading. The tribunal, chaired by Employment Judge Hawksworth with Mrs S Hockey and Ms B Osborne, heard the case on 8 and 9 June 2023 and gave judgment orally at the hearing.
The only claim recorded in the written judgment was a complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments, which is a disability discrimination claim. The tribunal's unanimous decision was that the complaint failed and was dismissed.
No monetary remedy was awarded, and the written record does not set out separate findings on compensation or any other remedy. The judgment notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested at the hearing or within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal unanimously dismissed the claimant's complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.