Case 3305089/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J P Lando v Metroline West Limited Heard via Cloud Video Platform (Watford) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3305089/2022
- Decision date
- 2 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J P Lando
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing heard remotely by Cloud Video Platform on 30 November 2022. Employment Judge Davidson noted that the claimant did not attend and that the respondent was represented by Ms S Nicolaou, solicitor (non-practising).
The only disposal recorded in the written judgment is that the claimant's complaint of race discrimination was struck out under Rule 37(1)(c) of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure. The reason given was the claimant's failure to provide the information ordered by the tribunal on 17 July 2022.
No merits findings or remedy findings are recorded. The judgment is limited to the strike-out decision and notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of sending the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant's complaint of race discrimination was struck out under Rule 37(1)(c) because he failed to provide the information ordered by the tribunal on 17 July 2022. | Struck out | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(c) of the Tribunal's Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.