Case 3305094/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Caesari v SBM MEDIA Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3305094/2022
- Decision date
- 26 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Caesari
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore dealt with the claim in the respondent's absence on the papers.
The tribunal found that SBM Media Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) had made unauthorised deductions from Mr A Caesari's wages in relation to wages owed for February and March 2022. The judgment does not record any competing evidence or alternative explanation from the respondent.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr Caesari the gross sum of £1,364.64. No other head of claim or additional remedy is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages owed for February and March 2022 and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,364.64. | Upheld | — | £1,365 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,365
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.