Case 3305097/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J J Oczkowicz v The Langley Hall Primary Academy Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 3305097/2023
- Decision date
- 5 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J J Oczkowicz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 21 November 2023, Employment Judge Anstis sitting alone recorded that all of the claimant’s claims were dismissed except for the claims of direct sex and race discrimination said to have occurred on 28 February 2023 and the claims dealt with in paragraph 2 of the judgment. The record does not set out any merits findings on those surviving discrimination claims; it only identifies them as not falling within the dismissal in paragraph 1.
Paragraph 2 states that it is just and equitable to extend time in respect of the claimant’s alleged direct sex and direct race discrimination claims occurring on 26 January 2023, as identified in the order of Employment Judge Shields dated 9 October 2023. The judgment therefore records a limitation decision for those 26 January discrimination claims rather than a substantive determination of liability.
No monetary award is recorded in this written judgment, and it contains no separate remedy assessment. It is an oral reasons record sent to the parties on 5 January 2024.
Claims and outcomes
8 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Alleged direct sex discrimination on 28 February 2023; this judgment states it was not dismissed. | Other | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | Alleged direct race discrimination on 28 February 2023; this judgment states it was not dismissed. | Other | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | Alleged direct sex discrimination on 26 January 2023; time was extended as just and equitable. | Other | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | Alleged direct race discrimination on 26 January 2023; time was extended as just and equitable. |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.