Case 3305107/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Sale v DHL International (UK) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3305107/2022
- Decision date
- 17 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Hunt Representation
- Venue
- Watford -
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Sale
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed as a HGV lorry driver and was summarily dismissed after a road traffic accident on 24 December 2021. The tribunal found that the claimant's HGV hit a stationary vehicle's open door while the other driver was standing by it, causing damage to the car door and to the claimant's vehicle. The claimant had seen the driver and open door, did not slow down, and did not stop after passing when he could no longer see the car or driver in his rear view mirror.
For unfair dismissal, the tribunal recorded that the claimant accepted the respondent had a genuine belief in misconduct, reasonable grounds for that belief, and had carried out a reasonable investigation. The central issue was whether dismissal was within the band of reasonable responses. The tribunal found that the respondent could reasonably categorise the incident and the claimant's conduct as gross misconduct within its disciplinary policy, including neglect of duty, bringing the company into disrepute, and deliberate or reckless damage.
The tribunal found that the disciplinary and appeal managers had considered the incident in detail, including CCTV footage, and were reasonably concerned about the claimant's failure to slow down, his failure to stop, and his inconsistent acceptance of responsibility, remorse and insight. It concluded that dismissal was within the band of reasonable responses and was fair. On the wrongful dismissal claim, the tribunal made its own findings and held that the claimant's actions warranted summary dismissal, so the respondent was not in breach of contract by dismissing without notice or pay in lieu of notice.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claim for unfair dismissal was not well founded and that the respondent's dismissal of the claimant was fair. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the respondent was not in breach of contract in summarily dismissing the claimant, so the wrongful dismissal claim failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98(2)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- British Home Stores v Burchell
- Burchell test
- Taylor v OCS Group Limited
- Brito-Babapulle v Ealing Hospital NHS Trust
- Trusthouse Forte (Catering) Limited v Adonis
- Paul v East Surrey District Health Authority
- band of reasonable responses
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.