Case 3305108/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Nawroz v Mr A Ekrayim & Others Trading as Damasgate Wholesale — 2023
- Case reference
- 3305108/2022
- Decision date
- 25 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Caiden Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Nawroz
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford on 13-14 March 2023 before Employment Judge Caiden. The tribunal record lists the claimant as Mr J Nawroz and the respondent as Mr A Ekrayim & Others trading as Damasgate Wholesale. The judgment contains no separate reasons beyond the disposition of each complaint.
The complaint of failure to pay statutory redundancy pay was recorded as dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. The unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed as not well-founded, as were the complaints of unauthorised deduction from wages relating to furlough and/or sick pay for March-October 2020 and annual bonus payments for 2020, 2021 and 2022.
The tribunal also dismissed the holiday pay complaint, described as non-payment of holiday pay for holidays taken up to the end of the 2020 leave year, and the wrongful dismissal complaint, described as a breach of contract claim for failure to pay notice pay. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Complaint of failure to pay statutory redundancy pay; recorded as dismissed upon withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Found not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for failure to pay furlough and/or sick pay in March-October 2020; found not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for non-payment of annual bonus in 2020, 2021, and 2022; found not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for non-payment of holiday pay for all holidays taken up to the end of the 2020 leave year; found not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Breach of contract claim for failure to pay notice pay; found not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.