Case 3305116/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Bailey v CamelotPM Ltd in compulsory liquidation — 2021
- Case reference
- 3305116/2020
- Decision date
- 7 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Bailey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal made no merits findings on the employment claims. It recorded that CamelotPM Ltd was in compulsory liquidation and that the permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
On 15 March 2021 the tribunal gave Mrs L Bailey an opportunity to provide written reasons within 14 days why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
The judgment does not record any remedy, liability finding, or award, and it does not identify any panel members beyond Regional Employment Judge Foxwell sitting alone.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim without determining the underlying merits. It recorded that the respondent was in compulsory liquidation, that permission of the court had not been obtained to institute or continue the proceedings, and that the claimant had not given an acceptable reason after being given an opportunity on 15 March 2021 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.