Case 3305127/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Jenny Millar, Niece For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 3305127/2020
- Decision date
- 15 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms Jenny Millar, Niece For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an open preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Alliott, sitting alone by CVP on 26 July 2021. The issue for determination was whether Mr B McMullan met the definition of disability under s.6 Equality Act 2010 before the end of his employment, specifically between 2 and 23 January 2020.
The tribunal reviewed the statutory definition of disability, Schedule 1 paragraph 5 on treatment or correction, the 2011 statutory guidance, and the authorities in Metroline Travel Ltd v Stoute and Taylor v Ladbrokes Betting & Gaming Ltd. It accepted evidence from the claimant, two disability impact statements, a GP letter, medication records and medicine leaflets.
The judge found that the claimant had Type 2 Diabetes diagnosed on 26 April 2007 and was taking medication, with the GP letter referring to drugs principally for diabetes, blood pressure, gastric protection and cholesterol. The claimant also controlled the condition by diet and abstinence from alcohol. Although the GP record noted well-controlled diabetes on 15 June 2020, the tribunal held that the statutory question was the likely effect without the treatment.
The tribunal concluded that, without medication and diet, the condition would have a substantial adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities, including the risk of hypoglycaemia and the possible effects of heart disease, kidney disease, blindness and poor circulation. It therefore held that Mr McMullan was disabled within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010 at all material times between 2 and 23 January 2020. No monetary award was made in this judgment; the case management section referred the parties to judicial mediation and directed an updated schedule of loss, a cast list and a short neutral chronology.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal found that, at all material times between 2 and 23 January 2020, the claimant was disabled within the meaning of s.6 Equality Act 2010 by reason of Type 2 Diabetes; no final liability decision on the underlying claims was made in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 paragraph 5 Equality Act 2010
- Equality Act 2010 guidance on the definition of disability (2011)
- Metroline Travel Ltd v Stoute
- Taylor v Ladbrokes Betting & Gaming Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.