Case 3305133/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Walton v Ingram Micro (UK) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3305133/2023
- Decision date
- 8 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Islam Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Walton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 4 December 2023 before Employment Judge Islam, the claimant applied to amend her claim to include a complaint of discrimination. That application was refused. The judgment records that the tribunal did not allow the discrimination complaint to be added, so no discrimination claim was determined on the merits.
The claimant’s unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because it was not presented within the applicable time limit and the tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable for her to have brought it in time. As the unfair dismissal claim failed on limitation grounds, the claimant’s further application to amend that claim to provide better particulars fell away and was also refused.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to do so. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.