Case 3305134/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr P Clarke, Director — 2024
- Case reference
- 3305134/2023
- Decision date
- 14 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Ord Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge M Ord, sitting at Cambridge on 5 March 2024, heard Miss Lorraine Cruickshank's complaints against Team Recruitment Limited and Recruitment Finder Limited. The complaint against Recruitment Finder Limited was found not well founded and was dismissed. The complaints against Team Recruitment Limited were found well founded.
The Tribunal found that the Claimant was dismissed on the ground of redundancy and that her dismissal was not unfair. The Claimant was nonetheless entitled to a statutory redundancy payment, notice pay, and outstanding holiday pay.
The total award to the Claimant was £13,590.14, comprising a statutory redundancy payment of £9,230.64, notice pay of £3,684.00, and outstanding holiday pay of £675.40. Written reasons were not provided as the reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Tribunal found the Claimant was dismissed on the ground of redundancy and that the dismissal was not unfair. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded. | Upheld | — | £9,231 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay awarded; treated as breach of contract claim per gov.uk listing categorisation. | Upheld | — | £3,684 |
| Holiday pay | Outstanding holiday pay awarded under Working Time Regulations. | Upheld | — | £675 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,590
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.