Case 3305160/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person; not represented For the v Mr R Panesar, RSP Invest Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3305160/2022
- Decision date
- 26 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Coll
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person; not represented For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge Coll, upheld Mr Rodrigues's claim for unlawful deduction from wages. It found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction by not paying any wages due in the payslip dated 4 February 2022 and ordered the gross sum of £726 to be paid to the claimant.
The tribunal also upheld the holiday pay claim. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,380 gross in respect of holiday pay arising from the claimant's period of service from 1 April 2021 to 31 January 2022. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any income tax and employee national insurance contributions due.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages because no wages due in the payslip dated 4 February 2022 were paid. | Upheld | — | £726 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay was awarded for the claimant's period of service from 1 April 2021 to 31 January 2022. | Upheld | — | £1,380 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,106
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.