Case 3305161/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Coastal Partnership and NHS Confederation — 2023
- Case reference
- 3305161/2022
- Decision date
- 24 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Allen
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt an open preliminary hearing on the respondent's application, Employment Judge Allen struck out the claimant's claim in its entirety because it had no reasonable prospects of success. The tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant had not achieved two years' qualifying employment under section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal also noted that, on the claimant's own account at paragraph 2 of the claim, she was a worker.
The claimant applied for leave to amend the claim to breach of contract out of time. The tribunal considered whether that proposed claim had any reasonable prospect of success and concluded that it did not. It found there was no written contract to rely on, and that the emails on which the claimant relied showed an invitation to treat by the practice, an offer to work by the claimant, but no acceptance by the respondent.
Because the proposed breach of contract claim had no reasonable prospect of success, the tribunal decided it would not be in the interests of justice to exercise its discretion to allow the amendment. The claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out at an open preliminary hearing because the tribunal had no jurisdiction: the claimant had not achieved two years' qualifying employment under section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal also noted that, on her own account at paragraph 2 of the claim, she was a worker. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claimant applied for leave to amend her claim to breach of contract out of time. The tribunal refused leave, finding no written contract and concluding that the emails relied on showed an invitation to treat and an offer to work, but no acceptance by the respondent. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonable prospect of success
- interests of justice
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.