Case 3305172/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Cheshire v Samsons Properties Ltd T/a Century21 Bedford — 2026
- Case reference
- 3305172/2020
- Decision date
- 29 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Cheshire
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after no response had been received from the respondent. Employment Judge Ord recorded that the claimant, Miss S Cheshire, had suffered unlawful deductions from her wages, had been dismissed in breach of contract, and had not been paid for accrued annual leave.
The judgment was a liability decision only. It did not assess or quantify the compensation payable. Instead, the tribunal directed that a separate hearing to determine remedy would be held at Cambridge, with a time allocation of one hour, and that notice of hearing would follow.
The decision was sent to the parties and entered in the register on 19 October 2020. No legal test was set out in the text provided, and no lay members are listed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: no response having been received to the claimant's claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract; remedy was not determined in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claimant was not paid for accrued annual leave; remedy was to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.