Case 3305176/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Alan Bahia v Medox Tutors Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3305176/2022
- Decision date
- 4 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Alan Bahia
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Reading on 4 May 2023 before Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto. Mr Alan Bahia appeared in person and Medox Tutors Limited was represented by Mr R Agarwal, the business owner.
The written judgment records that the claimant’s complaint about unauthorised deduction from wages and holiday pay was not well founded and was dismissed. No separate factual findings or legal analysis are set out in the written record beyond that conclusion.
The judgment also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note at the end of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant’s complaint about unauthorised deduction from wages and holiday pay was dismissed; no separate findings were set out for this head. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claimant’s complaint about unauthorised deduction from wages and holiday pay was dismissed; no separate findings were set out for this head. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.