Case 3305194/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms F Burch v The Wellbeing Space Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3305194/2023
- Decision date
- 11 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms F Burch
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21. It found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £951.50 gross.
The tribunal also found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £423.50 gross. No other findings, tests, or panel members are stated in the short judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and orders payment of the gross sum of £951.50. | Upheld | — | £952 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and orders payment of the gross sum of £423.50. | Upheld | — | £424 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,375
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.