Case 3305199/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Morgan v ASC UK Technologies Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3305199/2020
- Decision date
- 23 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Morgan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the tribunal found that the claimant’s claim for damages for breach of contract in respect of notice pay succeeded, and ordered the respondent to pay £5,500. The claimant’s separate breach of contract claim for expenses also succeeded, with an order for £545.25.
The tribunal also found that the claimant’s complaint of unfair dismissal succeeded. It did not determine the remedy for unfair dismissal in this judgment. Instead, it directed that a further hearing would take place to decide the remedy due for unfair dismissal and to consider whether the claimant was entitled to succeed in respect of complaints about unpaid wages and holiday pay, and, if so, the amount payable.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for damages for breach of contract (notice pay) succeeded. | Upheld | — | £5,500 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for damages for breach of contract (expenses) succeeded. | Upheld | — | £545 |
| Unfair dismissal | Liability succeeded; remedy was left to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,045
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.