Case 3305208/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Mumford v Qube Qualifications and Development Limited (in Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3305208/2023
- Decision date
- 20 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss L Mumford
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 5 September 2025, the Tribunal gave Miss Mumford an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the complaint of notice pay, holiday pay, redundancy pay and wages should not be struck out. The Tribunal said this was because she had not complied with the order dated 20 June 2025 and the complaint had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the complaint.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Composite complaint described in the judgment as notice pay, holiday pay, redundancy pay and wages. The Tribunal struck it out because the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 20 June 2025, had not actively pursued it, and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the letter dated 5 September 2025. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.