Case 3305212/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H. Adam v Positive Community Care Ltd (in liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3305212/2020
- Decision date
- 13 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McNeill QC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H. Adam
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing at Watford by CVP on 18 June 2021, before Employment Judge McNeill QC, the Claimant appeared in person and the Respondent did not appear. The tribunal upheld the Claimant's claims for unlawful deductions and breach of contract.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay £1,055.70 in respect of unpaid wages due for February 2020. It also awarded £2,250.00 in damages for breach of contract, that sum representing Universal Credit the Claimant was entitled to in October and November 2019 and January 2020 but did not receive because the Respondent misreported her earnings to HMRC.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Upheld in respect of unpaid wages due for February 2020. | Upheld | — | £1,056 |
| Breach of contract | Upheld; damages were awarded for Universal Credit that the Claimant was entitled to in October and November 2019 and January 2020 but did not receive because the Respondent misreported her earnings to HMRC. | Upheld | — | £2,250 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,306
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.