Case 3305243/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Morgan v Greencore — 2022
- Case reference
- 3305243/2021
- Decision date
- 1 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Morgan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 1 April 2022, the tribunal gave Ms T Morgan an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, explaining why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The judgment records that she failed to make representations in writing, failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The decision does not contain any substantive findings on the underlying employment complaints, and it records no monetary remedy. The judgment is signed by Employment Judge Tynan and dated 25 April 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment does not specify the substantive claim type in the text, but the case listing categories indicate redundancy and unfair dismissal. The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not specify the substantive claim type in the text, but the case listing categories indicate redundancy and unfair dismissal. The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.