Case 3305246/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Stratford v Banbury Heating Supplies Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3305246/2020
- Decision date
- 11 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hill REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Stratford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing on 11 November 2021 before Employment Judge Hill, the tribunal dealt only with timeliness and reconsideration issues. It held that claim 3304278/2020 had been properly rejected under the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Sch.1 para 10 and that it was reasonably practicable for that claim to have been presented in time. The claimant’s application for reconsideration of that claim failed.
The tribunal also held that claim 3305246/2020 was out of time, but that it was reasonably practicable for it to have been presented in time. The claimant’s application to extend time for presentation of both claims failed, and the tribunal dismissed both claims. No substantive liability was determined and no monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim type inferred from the case listing; the body of the judgment addresses only rejection, time limits, and reconsideration, not the substantive allegation. The tribunal held this claim was properly rejected under Sch.1 para 10 and that it was reasonably practicable for it to have been presented in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claim type inferred from the case listing; the body of the judgment addresses only time limits and does not identify the substantive complaint in the text. The tribunal held this claim was out of time, that it was reasonably practicable for it to have been presented in time, and that the application to extend time failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Sch.1 para 10
- reasonably practicable
- extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.