Case 3305246/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Riley v Aurachain UK Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3305246/2023
- Decision date
- 24 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge French
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Riley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 12 September 2024, the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why its response should not be struck out for failure to comply with the Tribunal's order of 4 October 2023 requiring the documents needed for the hearing bundle. The respondent did not make sufficient representations and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the response. It recorded that the respondent would remain entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions, but would only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
The final hearing was converted to a one-day remedy hearing. This judgment does not record any substantive liability findings on the pleaded claims and does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This judgment struck out the respondent's response because the respondent had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 4 October 2023 to provide the documents needed for the hearing bundle, and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. The judgment does not record a substantive determination of the pleaded claims. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.