Case 3305247/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Toms, Counsel For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3305247/2018
- Decision date
- 7 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrew Clarke
- Venue
- Amersham
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr Toms, Counsel For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Amersham hearing on 7 October 2019, before Employment Judge Andrew Clarke QC, the tribunal recorded that all claims in cases 3305247/2018 and 3314046/2019 were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. The withdrawal was recorded as being on terms set out in a written agreement signed by the parties.
The judgment contains no substantive findings on liability or remedy. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless either party requested them within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The short withdrawal judgment does not set out the underlying complaint; this claim type is inferred from the GOV.UK listing for the decision, which identifies disability discrimination as one of the jurisdiction codes. The judgment records that all claims in both cases were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant under a written agreement. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The short withdrawal judgment does not set out the underlying complaint; this claim type is inferred from the GOV.UK listing for the decision, which identifies unlawful deduction from wages as one of the jurisdiction codes. The judgment records that all claims in both cases were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant under a written agreement. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.