Case 3305250/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Stevens v Mc Cleaning Company — 2021
- Case reference
- 3305250/2021
- Decision date
- 20 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Stevens
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 4 May 2021. The respondent did not present a valid response in time, so the Employment Judge said a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the papers, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. That claim was therefore upheld. The judgment states that the respondent must pay the claimant £268.
The decision does not record any split between different heads of loss, nor does it refer to any discrimination, dismissal, or other claims. It is a short default judgment limited to the unpaid holiday entitlement award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Default judgment under rule 21. The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £268. | Upheld | — | £268 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £268
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.