Case 3305253/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Fiaz Hussain v Cordant Security Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3305253/2020
- Decision date
- 20 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Fiaz Hussain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent had not entered a response and was in administration from 2 March 2020. The administrators consented to the automatic stay being lifted and stated that the respondent would not be represented at the hearing.
The tribunal found that the claimant's contract guaranteed 336 hours of work per year. It treated 9 September 2015 as the commencement date and, in the absence of a response or evidence to the contrary, treated the claimant's employment as ceasing on 2 March 2020 when the respondent went into administration.
The tribunal calculated unpaid wages by reference to guaranteed annual hours and the applicable hourly rates for the relevant periods. It held that the respondent was in breach of contract in not paying the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £6,852.72.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes the claim as breach of contract for non-payment of wages and orders a gross sum; it does not separately adjudicate an unlawful deduction from wages claim. | Upheld | — | £6,853 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,853
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.