Case 3305274/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Callender v BPACare Limited and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 3305274/2020
- Decision date
- 7 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maxwell
- Panel members
- Ms Telfer, Mr Maclean
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr S Callender
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr S Callender, brought a race discrimination claim and claims for unlawful deductions and annual leave. The hearing took place at Watford by CVP on 6 and 7 March 2022 before Employment Judge Maxwell sitting with Ms Telfer and Mr Maclean. The respondents did not attend.
The tribunal dismissed the race discrimination claim as not well-founded. No further reasoning is included in the extracted text beyond that finding.
The tribunal found the unlawful deductions claim well-founded and awarded the claimant £369.23 against the Second Respondent, Street Support Limited. It also found the annual leave claim well-founded and awarded £738.46 against the Second Respondent. The extracted judgment does not allocate any part of the award to the First Respondent.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that this claim succeeded against the Second Respondent only. | Upheld | — | £369 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes this as an 'annual leave claim' and awards it against the Second Respondent only. | Upheld | — | £738 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,108
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.